I DO NOT MEAN TO OFFEND ANYONE by writing this. I just want to share my thoughts on the matter.
Okay, I
am taking the bait. I may or may not actually post this. BUT I read this this
morning and it has been on my mind on and off all day. Tonight I am sitting
down to read it again and as I read I just have to object my points into it. I don’t care to get into an emotional
debate over this. I do believe that the foundation of this blog post is
simply incorrect. While I do agree with some things I do believe the premise of
the whole argument is based on an incorrect understanding or a misunderstanding
of what the General Authorities are actually saying. Letting emotions get the best of us! In
saying this I don’t want to condemn. But I do want people to look past an
emotional argument, and look past emotion in general and let the Light of
Christ guide. Moroni 7: 16-17 For
Behold, the Spirit of Christ is given to every man, that he may know good from
evil; wherefore I show unto you the way to judge; for every thing which inviteth to do good, and to persuade
to believe in Christ, is sent forth by the power and gift of Christ;
wherefore ye may know with a PERFECT KNOWLEDGE it is of God. But whatsoever
thing persuadeth men to do evil, and believe not in Christ, and deny him, and serve not
God, then ye may know with a PERFECT KNOWLEDGE it is of the devil; for after
this manner doth the devil work, for he persuadeth
no man to do good, no not one…
So I
suppose I start my two cents on this post by saying; if agreeing with this post
is drawing you closer to God then it is good. If it is not. It is not good. It
really is that simple. I also love that is says in the scripture with
knowledge. I fear too often we get caught up with emotion. Knowledge is much
more powerful and quite frankly withstands arguments than does emotional ideas.
I have
copied the original post into this blog, and I will add my thoughts in a
different color. I am not putting anyone down in doing this I am simply showing
another side to the emotional argument at hand.
The
only reason I am posting this is because when I read the post I fear that
others who may read may get the idea that women in the church are blamed,
oppressed, viewed as less than males, or not respected. This is simply not
true. Women are valued and respected and honored and viewed as equal. The fact
is that everyone is responsible for the acts they commit. No one is to blame.
Her whole blog without being interrupted from me can be found here:
http://rebeccaamoore.wordpress.com/2014/02/15/modest-is-not-hottest/
Modest Is
Not Hottest
So for those of
you who aren’t familiar with how Mormons dress, we have modesty standards,
similar to other faiths. We wear clothes that have some sort of sleeve,
shorts/skirts to the knee, and nothing too low in the front or back. This is an
outward expression of an inward commitment. This essay is in no way intended to
imply I am unhappy with dressing modestly. This is actually something I have
chosen to do, and love to do.
Modesty is a lot
of things, and it is primarily a way in which we show respect for our bodies
and Heavenly Father. However, over the
years, as I’ve attended Firesides, Girls Camp, Youth Activities, Sunday School,
etc., I occasionally heard a different message. Modesty was my responsibility
to make sure the boys around me were not tempted toward immoral thoughts or
actions. Now that I’m older, I’ve started hearing it even more. This is simply
unacceptable.
YES! In
the For the Strength of Youth Pamphlet is says; Your
body is sacred. Respect it and do not defile it in any way. Through your dress
and appearance, you can show that you know how precious your body is. You can
show that you are a disciple of Jesus Christ and that you love Him. Prophets of
God have continually counseled His children to dress modestly. When you are
well groomed and modestly dressed, you invite the companionship of the Spirit
and you can be a good influence on others. It also quotes 1 Corinthians 3:16-17
Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth
in you… The temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.
The next part I disagree with in her
paragraph. She says; it is unacceptable for her to have responsibility to keep
the men around her having clean and pure thoughts. Yes, if this is what General
Authorities are saying IT WOULD BE UNACCEPTABLE!!! BUT THEY ARE NOT! Thank
Goodness!! I would have a problem with that too!!! Now perhaps individual
leaders that this blogger may have misguided or misinterpreted quotes but I
have NEVER ever ever heard this. I do believe that she or people who may have
been falsely teaching her are eluding to this talk by Elder Oaks that is very
graphic and clear of the effects of pornography on men and it is clear that the
onus is on the man to change and to be pure. And He says near the end; And
young women, please understand that if you dress immodestly, you are magnifying
this problem by becoming pornography to some of the men who see you… the whole
talk can be found here: http://www.lds.org/ensign/2005/05/pornography
What He is saying is that out of respect for men who do struggle with
impure thoughts if affects them so be kind. He isn’t saying, it is your duty to
use your agency to keep men pure. And He certainly isn’t saying it is your
fault. That is nonsense. Absolutely doctrinally void. Agency is within. I
cannot make choices for my kids, I cannot make choices for my husband and I
cannot change anyone… Ever! I can have influence but because of agency I will
never have that ability. Men and women are free to choose for themselves.
He is also teaching in this quote
that our actions influence others. This is not new. It is true in many
different ways. Even if I do not intend a specific consequence for an act or
action I may do it doesn’t make consequence not happen.
Really
I could stop there because the whole premise of this blog is based on
inappropriate interpretation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Persuading men and women to be caught up on
a problem that doesn’t actually exist drawing them away from Christ. I do
however after some conversation with someone that she too had a similar
experience. To those who experienced this take heed to the correct doctrine and
ensure you do not teach falsely to your own children and youth you may have
influence over.
Implying that a
woman’s modesty is something to be done for the benefit of men and boys is a
destructive message for several reasons.
IF this
were the only message given, perhaps this would be the case. However as
discussed above as quoted in the strength of youth; we are taught much more!!
The second
Article of Faith states, “We believe that men will be punished for their own
sins…”
YES
Constantly
telling a girl that a man’s thoughts and actions are her responsibility is
doctrinally incorrect.
Yes,
however thank goodness we are not taught this! See above.
It also translates closely to the idea that it
is a woman’s responsibility to maintain the sexual standards of a relationship.
No it
doesn’t because we are not given the responsbility that this blogger has
insinuated we have.
Elder Jeffery R.
Holland said, “I have heard all my life that it is the young woman who has to
assume the responsibility for controlling the limits of intimacy in courtship
because a young man cannot. What an unacceptable response to such a serious
issue! What kind of man is he, what priesthood or power or strength or
self-control does this man have that lets him develop in society, grow to the
age of mature accountability, perhaps even pursue a university education and
prepare to affect the future of colleagues and kingdoms and the course of the
world, but yet does not have the mental capacity or the moral will to say, ‘I
will not do that thing?’ No, this sorry drugstore psychology would have us say,
‘He just can’t help himself. His glands have complete control over his
life–his mind, his will, his entire future.’… I refuse to buy some young man’s
feigned innocence who wants to sin and call it psychology.”
What a great quote!
Another problem
is these ideas can kill a girls image of herself as a daughter of God deserving
of respect.
Girls are often
told
boys will give women respect if they
are dressed in a respectful way, and they will behave inappropriately if you
are dressed inappropriately. Unfortunately, that’s not how the world works.
Some men behave disrespectful to women regardless of dress. Instances of rape
and sexual assault are often higher in countries with laws dictating how a
woman dress. Men with that mindset will not be deterred by fabric.
boys will give women respect if they
are dressed in a respectful way, and they will behave inappropriately if you
are dressed inappropriately. Unfortunately, that’s not how the world works.
Some men behave disrespectful to women regardless of dress. Instances of rape
and sexual assault are often higher in countries with laws dictating how a
woman dress. Men with that mindset will not be deterred by fabric.
Click to enlarge.
Although
I do find this world map very interesting and really quite sad I do believe it
points not to the fabric that is on the women in the countries involved but the
view of women as lower than males. The improper belief that man is superior. What a sad state. Rape is horrific.
I know in my own
life, I have always been meticulously modest. However, I have constantly been
at the receiving end of some of the most degrading comments. “Wow, you can tell
you have a huge rack even in that sweatshirt!” and “You’re a solid 8, except
for your boobs. They’re a 10,” probably come in as most memorable. I had FHE
brothers admit to me that they assumed I was not a very good Mormon because of
the way I’m built. As sweatshirt man pointed out, there is really only so much
I can do, short of wearing a giant bag to hide the fact I look like a woman.
For a long time,
when I would hear these things, my mind couldn’t but help think that it was
somehow my fault. I clearly wasn’t a very good person, or else I wouldn’t be
having men say things like this to me. My value as a daughter of God was being
degraded, and instead of demanding to be treated like a human being, I shrunk
back, thinking I had been the one in the wrong.
Like
she said and the end of her blog, not the opportunity to interact with many
stellar men! Yup, that about sums it up. It is unfortunate to have these
experiences and especially have it make you feel poorly about yourself. While I
do not wish to diminish the affect that these comments have obviously had on
her it does clearly show that no matter what we do (as she has done her part in
showing respect to herself and God) we are not responsible for others actions.
People have their agency to act. Inappropriate as the case is here and that is
NOT her fault. It is important when we struggle with things we turn to the
doctrine of the church to answer our problems and that means seeking knowledge
out of the best books.
Probably one of
the most concerning aspects of this mindset is it is a form of victim blaming.
Women at the receiving end of verbal, physical, or sexual assault are often
asked “Well, what did you do to provoke him,” “Were you asking for it,” or, one
of the most common, “What were you wearing?” Last I checked, when
given the commandment not to commit adultery there was no addendum that said
“Unless she was dressed like a slut, then it’s totally her fault, and you’re
off the hook.” Someone once told me that when you are teaching women to change
what they do to prevent being assaulted or raped, what you are actually doing
is saying “Make sure he assaults someone else.” You are not fixing the real
problem, which is the man’s problem. Men have to exist in the world where women
will have a variety of dressing habits. All of these women all are deserving of
respect, and if his thoughts or actions cannot be controlled, that is his
problem.
No one
deserves to be raped EVER. Period. Dress should not be brought into a
conversation of rape EVER.
I like dressing
modestly. I like other people being comfortable around me. But the real reason
I want to dress modestly is because for me, it is a way of looking forward to
respecting the covenants I will make in the temple. When I get dressed, I ask
myself, “If I was endowed, could I wear this?” No offense, but as a woman
whoes figure is somewhere between a greek sculpture and the women they used to
paint on airplanes in WWII, and legs that go to Canada, certainly dressing
modest is not hottest. But my choice in clothing is not about that, nor is it
about a need to hide my body. As I said at the beginning, it is an outward
display of an inward commitment, one that I would like to remind certain people
they are supposed to respect, too. (Yes, I’m looking at you Mr. RM who spends
the entire summer in a cut out tank top.) Modesty is an important principal,
but it is not one that should be taught as a scapegoat for men’s
responsibility.
Yes it
should not be taught as a scapegoat
for responsibility of men to keep themselves pure in act and thought and good thing it is not. Perhaps
people have incorrectly assumed that but plain and simple it is not. Perhaps
wherever this blogger lives the Mormon culture is this, if that is it is a
shame. It is not the doctrine of the church. And this blogger and anyone who
feels the same as her should get a doctrinal foundation on the subject and
speak up against it from the perspective of the doctrine. From the heading of
the talk I quoted above by Elder Oaks: Let us all improve our personal
behavior and redouble our efforts to protect our loved ones and our
environment from the onslaught of pornography. In no way is he pointing a
finger and blaming or putting responsibility on a specific gender. He is
specifically talking about pornography here but it could be talked applied to
many avenues.
DISCLAIMER: I
have had the privilege of interacting with a lot of stellar men in my life.
This is in no way supposed to be an indictment of the entire male population.


Thank you for sharing this. I had some similar thoughts, but facebook was not the correct forum to express them in :) I cringe when I observe women of my faith debating in public - mainly because there are so many people not of our faith who misunderstand our beliefs, I do not think it is wise to confuse them more! And it becomes contentious, too.
ReplyDeleteI thought of a talk Elder Holland gave in April 2003: "Parents simply cannot flirt with skepticism or cynicism, then be surprised when their children expand that flirtation into full-blown romance. If in matters of faith and belief children are at risk of being swept downstream by this intellectual current or that cultural rapid, we as their parents must be more certain than ever to hold to anchored, unmistakable moorings clearly recognizable to those of our own household. It won’t help anyone if we go over the edge with them, explaining through the roar of the falls all the way down that we really did know the Church was true and that the keys of the priesthood really were lodged there but we just didn’t want to stifle anyone’s freedom to think otherwise. No, we can hardly expect the children to get to shore safely if the parents don’t seem to know where to anchor their own boat."
and later he quotes Elder Richard L. Evans: "“Sometimes some parents mistakenly feel that they can relax a little as to conduct and conformity or take perhaps a so called liberal view of basic and fundamental things—thinking that a little laxness or indulgence won’t matter—or they may fail to teach or to attend Church, or may voice critical views. Some parents … seem to feel that they can ease up a little on the fundamentals without affecting their family or their family’s future. But,” he observed, “if a parent goes a little off course, the children are likely to exceed the parent’s example.”
Wise words.
Awesome read Laura and I think you make excellent points. If there's one thing I'm learning though, it is that the doctrine of the church and the culture of church membership often aren't in total harmony. I think you hit the nail on the head. I echo the bloggers feelings and opinions because I HAVE heard the same modesty spiel that she protests against. But in the end, it's our relationship with Christ and his doctrine that should guide us. Not the neighbours down the street. Thanks for bringing it home.
ReplyDeletehow enlightening.
ReplyDelete